Message Board


Message Board > Malarkey > Time travel is possible

May 31, 2006, 20:18
Woody
HEAD BLACK MAN
722 posts

I would enjoy going into that field.
____________
boredome is the bitter fruit of too much routine
#
May 31, 2006, 20:22
Woody
HEAD BLACK MAN
722 posts

I would write many dissertations on that theory.
____________
boredome is the bitter fruit of too much routine
#
May 31, 2006, 20:31
Woody
HEAD BLACK MAN
722 posts

I would manifest those bosons.
____________
boredome is the bitter fruit of too much routine
#
September 15, 2006, 14:35
Mike Green
Gone forever
23 posts
Quoting PEader:
Yes. How did you know? Are you that pervert in number 52 that watches me undress every night?


No thats me.
____________
So long and thanks for all the fish.
#
September 16, 2006, 11:59
yonni
None
420 posts
My opinion is that time is an illusion created by light, it's speed, and our brains, to describe events. Therefore, as it does not physically exist (as matter does) it is impossible to travel through it.

Also, as other dimensions may exist, there is little point theorising about it, as we have no senses with witch to detect sed dimensions, and therefore (as far as we, and any other creature we have yet discovered is concerned) they do not exist. Furthur on this point, other dimensions have not affected our (1st 2nd and 3rd, x, y and z) dimensions, and this would suggest that if they did exist, creatures existing in them (assuming they also exist), cannot detect or use our dimensions in any way. So, I conclude, in my humble opinion, that even if there are other dimensions (which I personally do not believe) then there is no point thinking about them.

Also, something I've just thought of, one way to change the speed at which we travel though time would be to change the speed of every particle ever (or even revese them to go back). In this case, this action of reversing particles would make us lose the memories of things that we are moving back though, forgetting that we have ever made such a time machine, therefore being unable to stop the process, hurlting back through time until the beggining of the universe, and ending up infinately traveling backwards though the infinate nothingness that was there before. However forwards time travel is more possible with this method. This is all assuming we can find a way to affect the speed of every particle ever.

Discuss.
____________
#
September 18, 2006, 23:29
Rhovanion
Exterminated
666 posts
How would you explain than that humans can place events on a timeline and measure it. Even without measuring you feel things that are long ago and things that are not so long ago.

Furthermore, it is absolutely necessary we post all kinds of string theories in this topic. :F

*erotic pictures sensored by PB*


please post more of your string theories! For the sake of science!

making thumbnails of these images is considered heresy. :groar:

[Edited on September 21, 2006 by PB]
____________
#
September 21, 2006, 23:36
PB
Defender of the faith
630 posts

Please don't post that kind of pictures on booleansoup.
____________
#
September 22, 2006, 04:34
Sandman
F3n!x0r
1194 posts

Omg, was there skin visible? OMG that just won't do. We must all abandon all visual goodness of life and nature. Remember PB, women are bad, especially naked.

About the string theory: I like them, but not on fat girls with pants low on there hips. That looks disgusting.
____________
BennuWiki
Yes, my avatar has grey borders in IE (so get a decent browser)
ROOFLEZ ROOFLEZ
#
September 22, 2006, 09:56
Rhovanion
Exterminated
666 posts
Excuse me PB. What was wrong with these girls dressed in a bikini? I think you should look up the meaning of erotica. This is not a happy catholic friends community. It has all kinds of people and you should respect other people's visions, meanings and your own culture. There was nothing visible that would hurt anyone's feelings. Stop living in the stone age, there are worse things. i.e. turn on TMF and watch Sean Paul's songs where 12 year olds look up to and think that's the way it should go. That's a problem, not this. I wonder who gets hurt by watching those pictures? please leave out any grandma or people older than 70 since they probably don't visit this forum. older people think it is nice and beautiful. This is what makes life fun.

Dennis.

[Edited on September 22, 2006 by Rhovanion]
____________
#
September 22, 2006, 20:01
PB
Defender of the faith
630 posts

I get hurt watching those pictures, because they bring me into temptation. I didn't look long enough at them to see if they where wairing any tops, but it seemed to me that they where not... If this kind of content is alowed on Booleansoup, I don't want to be a moderator...

There are enough sites where you can watch girls in bikini's if you want, but this is a website which is primary game related. Girls in bikini's are not game related, so in this case I ask YOU to respect people with other visions.
____________
#
September 22, 2006, 20:54
Sandman
F3n!x0r
1194 posts

* goes to make a game consisting solely of girls in bikini's *

You are the one censoring, not us. I don't find it respectful to just alter people's posts to a point where it doesn't make sense anymore. Instead of completely removing the picture, you could have made a non-clickable link, which doesn't alter the content of the post very intensely. Now I do hear you say 'who cares about such a picture being removed' and you are right about that, but still I stand by my case.
On the other hand one can say 'who cares about such a picture being in a topic, where it had some reference'. I don't mind at all. You do mind. I'd say there needs to be clarity on the rules of this board then.
Quoting rules:
No posting, linking to or uploading of pornographic material
Now I did not see the picture, but it seems you didn't actually study it either, but I guess the girl didn't expose her two boys, so I wouldn't classify it as porn. Actually, I wouldn't even if she did.
So: what does Booleansoup think is porn? If that can be desided, every admin/mod can follow that guideline.

Quoting PB:
I get hurt watching those pictures, because they bring me into temptation.
I don't see what's wrong with that. That's nature: guys like (half)naked women. Does the bible say 'thou shalt not enjoy the festivities of nature'?
____________
BennuWiki
Yes, my avatar has grey borders in IE (so get a decent browser)
ROOFLEZ ROOFLEZ
#
September 22, 2006, 21:56
Rincewind
programmer
1545 posts

"the festivities of nature" :laughcry:

Now don't get me wrong - I think there's nothing wrong with nude girls in general - but we originally decided on no posting of nude images, because this forum should be the happy family programming site open for all ages and all people, so yeah that also includes small kids who aren't sexually developed yet as well as the other gender, or even homosexuals or religious people who might not enjoy/be offensed looking at nude images.

We have decided on strict rules (check "the Moderator's guide"), however I think something went wrong putting them on the rules page or the "/nude" was removed, I'll add it again.

Other than that it was unnecessary to post 5-10 big half-nude images in this malarkey thread about time travel. And in case anyone didn't know: pornography involves multiple people having sex.
____________
Personal website: http://www.loijson.com
#
September 22, 2006, 22:14
Eckolin
Quite Whiskered
388 posts

Quoting [url=http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dict.asp?Word=pornographic:
The free dictionary[/url]]
Pornography: Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.

____________
Maker of Games...
Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom.
Need help with coding? I probably wrote something similar.
#
September 22, 2006, 22:39
Rincewind
programmer
1545 posts

Heh, that's strange, I'd swear there should be sex for it to be called porno. Oh well, I bet this solves it then and the rules page was right from the start.

[Edited on September 22, 2006 by Rincewind]
____________
Personal website: http://www.loijson.com
#
September 22, 2006, 22:51
Woody
HEAD BLACK MAN
722 posts

Quoting [url=http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pornography:
Dictionary.com[/url]]obscene writings, drawings, photographs, or the like, esp. those having little or no artistic merit.

hmm
____________
boredome is the bitter fruit of too much routine
#
September 22, 2006, 23:21
Sandman
F3n!x0r
1194 posts

I think the Dictionary.com's one is better, because it is more specific; the other one just grabs everything with the (primary) intention of arousal.
____________
BennuWiki
Yes, my avatar has grey borders in IE (so get a decent browser)
ROOFLEZ ROOFLEZ
#
September 22, 2006, 23:50
PB
Defender of the faith
630 posts

If you want to discuss this, why don't you do so in the admin forum, I think this is kind of pointless...
____________
#
September 23, 2006, 00:29
Mezzmer
Square-theorist
792 posts

TIME TRAVEL WILL BE FIRST APPLICABLE IN COMPUTERS... MEANING WE WILL SEE THE EARLY EXAMPLES IN VIRTUAL WORLDS
____________
#
September 23, 2006, 09:58
yonni
None
420 posts
Quoting Squarepusher:
TIME TRAVEL WILL BE FIRST APPLICABLE IN COMPUTERS... MEANING WE WILL SEE THE EARLY EXAMPLES IN VIRTUAL WORLDS


Surely anythings possible in virtual worlds, as we decide the rules
____________
#
September 30, 2006, 15:26
MadMax
None
18 posts
The point is whether the past happened or not, when I say the past I don't mean what we remember or what historians have written. I mean a REAL past. A past that is fixed. If the past is fixed, can't be changed, then a document from the past(writing, film, photo etc) will also stay fixed and not change. But if the past is changeable then these documents from the past would also change. I supose most of you will believe that the past is fixed.

If the past is fixed and let's say you manage to travel to Rome the day Julius Caesar was killed by Brutus, you wouldn't be able to be there because you weren't there in the first place. Of course if you are there it can only mean two things, either the past is changeable in which case it ceases to be a REAL past and can be changed and maybe it is constantly doing so, we can't remember it being changed because our memories change accordingly; or you are a nutty roman that believes he can remember the future and will be treated accordingly. You'd get a nice job in an Oracle.
____________
#
September 30, 2006, 15:57
Rincewind
programmer
1545 posts

2 Days ago an interesting article on signalling the past has appeared on the New Scientist site. You can get it here. I zipped it because it isn't accessible for non-members on the site itself, and didn't think copy/pasting the article is a good idea.
____________
Personal website: http://www.loijson.com
#

Page 1 , 2


Message Board > Malarkey > Time travel is possible

Quick reply


You must log in or register to post.
Copyright © 2005 Booleansoup.com
Questions? Comments? Bug reports? Contact us!